top of page

Why Consistent Survey Effort Unlocks Better Bird Data

Updated: Apr 19

The stunning Dartford Warbler is Britain’s most vibrant warbler species, yet its breeding habitats have not yet been surveyed in the BirdUTM Project. © Gyorgy Szimuly
The stunning Dartford Warbler is Britain’s most vibrant warbler species, yet its breeding habitats have not yet been surveyed in the BirdUTM Project. © Gyorgy Szimuly

Have you ever wondered why some locations seem to have more bird species recorded than others? The answer isn’t always about habitat quality or bird abundance – it is often about survey effort.

The scatter plot above shows the relationship between the number of surveys conducted at a given UTM location (x-axis) and the number of species recorded (y-axis).
The scatter plot above shows the relationship between the number of surveys conducted at a given UTM location (x-axis) and the number of species recorded (y-axis).

One key takeaway is clear: locations with more frequent surveys tend to show greater species richness.


What Does This Mean?

  1. More Surveys = More Discoveries

    Many survey locations with just a few visits cluster around lower species counts, while sites with 20+ surveys record significantly higher species richness. This suggests that repeated effort reveals more species over time, as birds are not always equally detectable across seasons, times of day, or weather conditions.

  2. Undersampled Sites May Not Reflect True Diversity

    The dense cluster of points on the left side of the graph (few surveys, lower species counts) likely represents sites that haven’t been surveyed enough to capture their full bird diversity. These locations may appear less species-rich simply because they haven’t been visited often enough to reflect their true bird communities.

  3. Long-Term Monitoring Yields Stronger Data

    The outliers with 50+ species recorded correspond to survey locations that have been visited the most. This highlights why standardized, repeated surveys – like those in the PatchBird Initiative – are crucial for accurate monitoring. The more we return to the same locations, the better we can understand bird populations and detect important trends over time.


The Takeaway for PatchBird Participants


If you’ve already contributed to the PatchBird Initiative, thank you! Your effort is invaluable. To maximize the scientific value of your surveys, consider adopting a location and revisiting it every 10-14 days. Over time, your observations will help fill in gaps, making our dataset more powerful for bird conservation.


Curious to get started? Learn more about survey methods at PatchBird's Website or join the discussion on our Facebook page!



Comentarios


bottom of page